<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC Requests Comments on Radiotechniques PSRA/PSSA Petition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amband.org/2007/07/fcc-requests-comments-on-radiotechniques-psrapssa-petition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amband.org/2007/07/fcc-requests-comments-on-radiotechniques-psrapssa-petition/</link>
	<description>Medium Wave broadcasting forever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:08:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nels</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2007/07/fcc-requests-comments-on-radiotechniques-psrapssa-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Nels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/index.php/2007/07/20/fcc-requests-comments-on-radiotechniques-psrapssa-petition/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I learned of this petition via the August issue of Radio Guide which came today, too late for the comment period. A search of the FCC site reveals no information on the petition. Without having seen the specifics of the petition, the suggestions seem reasonable. On a related matter, the FCC should change the now unnecessary protections for the clear channel powerhouses; regional stations are no longer necessary. Let them keep their current power while allowing the rest of us on the frequencies to infringe a bit more, at least enough to serve our listeners fulltime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned of this petition via the August issue of Radio Guide which came today, too late for the comment period. A search of the FCC site reveals no information on the petition. Without having seen the specifics of the petition, the suggestions seem reasonable. On a related matter, the FCC should change the now unnecessary protections for the clear channel powerhouses; regional stations are no longer necessary. Let them keep their current power while allowing the rest of us on the frequencies to infringe a bit more, at least enough to serve our listeners fulltime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadcast Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2007/07/fcc-requests-comments-on-radiotechniques-psrapssa-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadcast Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/index.php/2007/07/20/fcc-requests-comments-on-radiotechniques-psrapssa-petition/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AM Radio Changes Proposed - While Others Languish&lt;/strong&gt;

We&#039;ve recently written much about Internet radio, digital radio, digital television and all sorts of new technologies&#160;to electronically deliver&#160;media content.&#160; But the grandfather of all electronic media - AM radio -&#160;still provides...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AM Radio Changes Proposed &#8211; While Others Languish</strong></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve recently written much about Internet radio, digital radio, digital television and all sorts of new technologies&nbsp;to electronically deliver&nbsp;media content.&nbsp; But the grandfather of all electronic media &#8211; AM radio -&nbsp;still provides&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
