<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AMband.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amband.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amband.org</link>
	<description>Medium Wave broadcasting forever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>KNSN nee KSON gets new tower after 2004 Collapse</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2009/01/knsn-nee-kson-gets-new-tower-after-2004-collapse/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2009/01/knsn-nee-kson-gets-new-tower-after-2004-collapse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call Signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KNSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KSON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self supporting tower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tower Collapse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From CGC Communicator &#8211;  The new KSON(AM) tower was
completed and activated today at about 4:30 p.m. according
to Joel Saxberg who performed the RF matching.  The tower is
grounded at its base and skirted to permit RF to be induced
onto the structure.

Actually, two stations are diplexed onto the tower, each
with its own set of tuning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a title="CGC Communicator" href="http://www.bext.com/_CGC/">CGC Communicator</a> &#8211;  The new KSON(AM) tower was<br />
completed and activated today at about 4:30 p.m. according<br />
to Joel Saxberg who performed the RF matching.  The tower is<br />
grounded at its base and skirted to permit RF to be induced<br />
onto the structure.<br />
<span id="more-79"></span><br />
Actually, two stations are diplexed onto the tower, each<br />
with its own set of tuning skirts.  The stations are KSON(AM)<br />
on 1240 kHz, now KNSN with its recent call sign change (&#8221;K North<br />
South North&#8221; as we call it); and KURS on 1040 kHz.  The remaining<br />
portion of the old tower structure will soon be dismantled and<br />
the RF matching to the new tower will be checked after that<br />
(there is obviously some mutual coupling between the towers).<br />
Both stations are currently operating at full power.</p>
<p>Congratulations to all parties involved and particularly<br />
to Eric Schecter, KSON&#8217;s former Director of Engineering, who<br />
performed a large part of the planning, and to Bill Eisenhamer<br />
who was involved in this project from the beginning and still<br />
has a large number of finish-up details to tidy up.</p>
<p>Following is a December 10, 2008 photo showing the remains<br />
of the old tower (left) and the new tower structure.  The new<br />
tower was just about completed at the time of the photo but<br />
still had a gin pole on top:</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://earthsignals.com/add_CGC/Images/KSON/kson_DAWN_sm.jpg">http://earthsignals.com/add_CGC/Images/KSON/kson_DAWN_sm.jpg</a></p>
<p>Here are some <a title="KSON U-Shaped tower" href="http://earthsignals.com/add_CGC/KSON.htm">photos shortly after the collapse</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2009/01/knsn-nee-kson-gets-new-tower-after-2004-collapse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are your tower lights on?</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2008/12/are-your-tower-lights-on/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2008/12/are-your-tower-lights-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC tower waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tower Light Inspections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC has issued waivers of the requirement to visually check tower lights annually instead of every three months when using a high tech monitoring system. Flash Technology&#8217;s ArgusON monitors have won the confidence of regulators to let broadcasters cut back on these visual inspections.
This is partcularly valuable when the tower site is remote, or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_74" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 130px"><a href="http://amband.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tower_light.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-74 " title="tower_light" src="http://amband.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tower_light-150x150.jpg" alt="Tower Lighting" width="120" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tower Lighting</p></div>
<p>The FCC has issued waivers of the requirement to visually check tower lights annually instead of every three months when using a high tech monitoring system. <a title="ArgusOn Monitors" href="http://flashtechnology.com/monitoring">Flash Technology&#8217;s ArgusON</a> monitors have won the confidence of regulators to let broadcasters cut back on these visual inspections.</p>
<p>This is partcularly valuable when the tower site is remote, or difficult to reach during winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2008/12/are-your-tower-lights-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC delays AM Translators</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2008/09/fcc-delays-am-translators/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2008/09/fcc-delays-am-translators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happenings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AM Translators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC has not said why, but it has postponed indefinately its decision on letting AM stations use FM translators.
More when we know!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCC has not said why, but it has postponed indefinately its decision on letting AM stations use FM translators.</p>
<p>More when we know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2008/09/fcc-delays-am-translators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After 20 Years the FCC Acts!</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2008/09/after-20-years-the-fcc-acts/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2008/09/after-20-years-the-fcc-acts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happenings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AM Directionak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Method of Moments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Consultants and Station Owners have been asking for twenty years for relief on burdensome rules to prove the performance of directional antennas for AM stations.
Last week the shoe finally dropped, and the Commission approved as a notice of proposed rulemaking, the analysis of directional antennas using Method-Of-Moments and rigorous monitoring standards to verify that AM [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://amband.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/measurements.gif"><img  title="measurements" src="http://amband.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/measurements-227x300.gif" alt="Field Measurements on the way out" align="right" width="227" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Consultants and Station Owners have been asking for twenty years for relief on burdensome rules to prove the performance of directional antennas for AM stations.</p>
<p>Last week the shoe finally dropped, and the Commission approved as a notice of proposed rulemaking, the analysis of directional antennas using Method-Of-Moments and rigorous monitoring standards to verify that AM antennas actually perform as they should.  The new rules only apply to series fed, non-toploaded, non sectionalized towers.</p>
<p>For stations meeting the specifications, it means a substantial decrease in cost to commission or rebuild an AM directional array.  The labor intensive and sometimes dangerous and always problematic field measurements may be dispensed with.</p>
<p>For those who choose, the old way remains available.  Several safeguards have been added &#8211; regular calibration of the entire sample system, and external measurement reference points.  The good thing about this is that it all encourages regular rational maintenance of antenna systems, instead of inhibiting repairs to ailing systems.</p>
<p>Stations with series fed simple radiators and solid sampling systems may want to consider going through the effort of changing over to the new regulatory scheme, especially if the system needs a good cleanup.</p>
<p>The complete <a title="Report and Order" href="http://hrawnfoss.fcc.gov/edocs/attachmatch/FCC-08-228A1.pdf">Report and Order</a> is available at the <a title="Media Branch Website" href="http://fcc.gov/mb/">FCC website.</a>  This is now at the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking stage, with a comment and reply comment period, and publication period before the final rules are in place.  There could still be a hitch if someone files comments that cause serious reconsideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2008/09/after-20-years-the-fcc-acts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yet another one for the Public Inspection File</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2008/09/yet-another-one-for-the-public-inspection-file/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2008/09/yet-another-one-for-the-public-inspection-file/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JimP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a link to the FCC website for a document that is to be kept with the Public Inspection Fle.
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/public_and_broadcasting.pdf
I thought that you should be aware of it.
I became aware of it by reading about it in a trade journal this summer.
Basically, Public and Broadcasting is FCC 101 for the layman.  It is 33 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a link to the FCC website for a document that is to be kept with the Public Inspection Fle.</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/public_and_broadcasting.pdf">http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/public_and_broadcasting.pdf</a></p>
<p>I thought that you should be aware of it.<br />
I became aware of it by reading about it in a trade journal this summer.</p>
<p>Basically, Public and Broadcasting is FCC 101 for the layman.  It is 33 pages long.</p>
<p>The html version is at <span style="font-size: 12pt; color: blue;"> <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/public_and_broadcasting.html">http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/public_and_broadcasting.html</a>.</span></p>
<p>Please contact your FCC attorney for relevant advice.</p>
<p>JIM P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2008/09/yet-another-one-for-the-public-inspection-file/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coping with the environmental mandates of FCC Part 1.1306, 1.1307</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2008/09/coping-with-the-environmental-mandates-of-fcc-part-11306-11307/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2008/09/coping-with-the-environmental-mandates-of-fcc-part-11306-11307/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JimP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a way to cope.  Try a little Karma &#8212;enjoy!






The 			Environmental Thesauris




Instead of Writing this:


Write this!



We will be replacing a buried cable	.

We 			will emancipate the corpulence of an electromagnetic medium with 			the internment of another that shall repose and be at one with the 			bosom of Mother Earth.



No high intensity lighting will be used.

Barbarian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>There is a way to cope.  Try a little Karma &#8212;enjoy!</strong></span></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" width="100%" bordercolor="#000000">
<col width="89"></col>
<col width="167"></col>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="100%" valign="top">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;" align="center"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>The 			Environmental Thesauris</strong></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="35%">
<p align="center"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>Instead of Writing this:</strong></span></p>
</td>
<td width="65%">
<p align="center"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>Write this!</strong></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="35%"><span style="font-size: x-small;">We will be replacing a buried cable	.</span></td>
<td width="65%" valign="top">
<p style="margin-left: 0.24in; margin-right: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">We 			will emancipate the corpulence of an electromagnetic medium with 			the internment of another that shall repose and be at one with the 			bosom of Mother Earth.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="35%"><span style="font-size: x-small;">No high intensity lighting will be used.</span></td>
<td width="65%" valign="top">
<p style="margin-left: 0.24in; margin-right: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Barbarian 			photons and their techno-dens of gestation will be banned from 			this site.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="35%"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The site is not in a flood plain</span></td>
<td width="65%" valign="top">
<p style="margin-left: 0.24in; margin-right: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The 			waters of  Mother  Earth will be spared  of any traumatic 			consumption at this site.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="35%"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The site is not in a designated wildernessor wild 			life preserve.</span></td>
<td width="65%" valign="top">
<p style="margin-left: 0.24in; margin-right: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The 			choice of this site was driven by  the deepest and existential 			empathy toward allcreatures; great and small.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="35%"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The site will not harm an endangered species</span></td>
<td width="65%" valign="top">
<p style="margin-left: 0.24in; margin-right: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The 			paradox of “endangered” harkens deep 	eflection. If they are 			endangered in so many places, then they are not truly endangered. 			They are just being anti-social. </span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="35%"><span style="font-size: x-small;">&#8211;nor disrupt nesting habits or habitats</span></td>
<td width="65%" valign="top">
<p style="margin-left: 0.24in; margin-right: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Our 			towers offer a haven for secluded nesting in a manner that rivals  			the  heights of  the giant Sequoia. What greater gift can man 			bestow on nature?   Imagine a mighty Sequoia in Ohio.—NOT!</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="35%"><span style="font-size: x-small;">&#8212;nor disrupt migratory routes</span></td>
<td width="65%" valign="top">
<p style="margin-left: 0.24in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The site embraces the freedom of flight, no matter 			what form it takes; whether it is by foot, hoof or wing.  The site 			 is like a meditation mantra that invokes the soul to leave the 			body.</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.24in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> — ohm — ohm</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.24in; margin-right: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Each 			cable at our site has 50 of these !!!</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2008/09/coping-with-the-environmental-mandates-of-fcc-part-11306-11307/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AM Regulatory fees &#8211; Huh??</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2008/08/am-regulatory-fees-huh/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2008/08/am-regulatory-fees-huh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happenings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daytimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just looking at the Fiscal Year &#8216;08 table of FCC regulatory fees for AM radio stations. At first I didn&#8217;t believe it, but Daytimers in small markets are getting screwed!
Class B stations, with real full-time service are hit with a $500 annual fee in the smallest markets, but daytimers (which have equivalent daytime [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just looking at the Fiscal Year &#8216;08 table of <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/fees/">FCC regulatory fees</a> for AM radio stations. At first I didn&#8217;t believe it, but Daytimers in small markets are getting screwed!</p>
<p>Class B stations, with real full-time service are hit with a $500 annual fee in the smallest markets, but daytimers (which have equivalent daytime facilities to class B stations, but only operate during sunlight hours) have to pay an extra $25 for the privilege of  shutting off at night.  Stations in these little markets are public services, and the FCC ought to pay them to operate.</p>
<p>In markets of 75,000 &#8211; 150,000 people, where an AM station might be able to make a nickel or two, the FCC in its great wisdom also charges daytimers an extra $25 to go off at night.</p>
<p>By my reconning, a daytime radio station should be charged between 3/4 and 1/2 of the equivalent class B station, simply because it is a limited authorization.   I wonder whether the FCC fee setters use the Oujii  or dart board method of setting fees.  Oh!, the splendor of FCC logic &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2008/08/am-regulatory-fees-huh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Mexican HD Stations on the Air</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2008/06/first-mexican-am-hd-stations-on-the-air/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2008/06/first-mexican-am-hd-stations-on-the-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Happenings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/onair.gif" alt=" alt="" align="right" /><a title="Radio Currents Magazine" href="http://radiomagonline.com/currents/currents-062208/#mexican">Radio Currents</a> reports that the first two Mexican stations have started broadcasting in HD Radio.</p>
<p>XEEZ 970 Radio Palacios is broadcasting an AM HD Radio signal from the U.S./Mexico border town of Caborca, Sonora, using a Broadcast Electronics transmission system.</p>
<p>XHTY-FM 94.5 in Tijuana on the FM Side has installed a Nautel V10 HD Radio transmitter. The station is operated by Uniradio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2008/06/first-mexican-am-hd-stations-on-the-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Public and Broadcasting Manual</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2008/06/new-public-and-broadcasting-manual/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2008/06/new-public-and-broadcasting-manual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC released a new &#8220;Public and Broadcasting&#8221; manual that is
required to be in your station&#8217;s Public Inspection File.
Here is the link to the manual.  It can be downloaded below.
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/public_and_broadcasting.pdf
Courtesy of Jim Pollock, PE
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCC released a new &#8220;Public and Broadcasting&#8221; manual that is<br />
required to be in your station&#8217;s Public Inspection File.</p>
<p>Here is the link to the manual.  It can be downloaded below.<br />
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/public_and_broadcasting.pdf">http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/public_and_broadcasting.pdf</a></p>
<p>Courtesy of Jim Pollock, PE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2008/06/new-public-and-broadcasting-manual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio-Locator Decoded</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2008/06/radio-locator-decoded/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2008/06/radio-locator-decoded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Receivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coverage maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio-Locator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiosoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service contour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have received a lot of questions about the contours shown on the Radio-Locator maps.  For AM they are:

Red  &#8211; 3.0 mV/m &#8211; Generally the Sellable area of the station
Purple &#8211; 0.5 mV/m &#8211; Rural protected service area, but nobody would buy ads.
Blue &#8211; 0.1 mV/m &#8211; You might still get it on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have received a lot of questions about the contours shown on the <a title="Radio-Locator" href="http://radio-locator.com" target="_blank">Radio-Locator</a> maps.  For AM they are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Red  &#8211; 3.0 mV/m &#8211; Generally the Sellable area of the station</li>
<li>Purple &#8211; 0.5 mV/m &#8211; Rural protected service area, but nobody would buy ads.</li>
<li>Blue &#8211; 0.1 mV/m &#8211; You might still get it on a car radio</li>
</ul>
<p>For FM they are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Red &#8211; 60 db/uV  or 1.0 mV/m &#8211; Protected service area for Class A and C stations</li>
<li>Purple &#8211; 50 db/uv or 0.316 mV/m &#8211; A pretty weak Signal, nobody would buy ads.</li>
<li>Blue &#8211; 40 db/uv or 0.1 mV/m &#8211; You won&#8217;t pick it up, except in rural areas</li>
</ul>
<p>I determined this by comparing the plots of sample stations in <a title="Radiosoft" href="http://www.radiosoft.com" target="_blank">Radiosoft&#8217;s</a> Comstudy with their Radio-Locator maps.  Hopefully this clears a few things up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2008/06/radio-locator-decoded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
