<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AMband.org &#187; HD Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amband.org/tag/hd-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amband.org</link>
	<description>Medium Wave broadcasting forever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:43:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AM Gets Short Shrift in Performance Royalty Deal</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2010/09/am-gets-short-shrift-in-performance-royalty-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2010/09/am-gets-short-shrift-in-performance-royalty-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happenings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Receivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AM Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FM in Cellpnone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protectionist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FM Radio in Cellphones vs Radio Broadcasters paying performance royalties is a bad deal for Broadcasters.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.nab.org/">NAB</a> and the <a title="RIAA" href="http://www.riaa.com/">RIAA</a> are busy cooking a deal for radio stations to pay music royalties to performers.  To make things appear better for Radio stations, the deal includes a scheme to put an FM analog radio into all cellphones by law.</p>
<p>Radio stations have  paid  royalties to composers for playing music on the air, but not to the performers.  This is because radio has traditionally been a great way for performers to promote their music.  That logic is no longer so firm, now that websites, streaming services and music appliances compete with radio for the music listener&#8217;s ears.</p>
<p><a title="Big Cellphone" href="http://amband.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/old-cellphone.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-91 alignleft" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="old-cellphone" src="http://amband.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/old-cellphone-187x300.jpg" alt="" hspace="5" width="187" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>The NAB initially responded to the calls for radio to pay performance royalties by labeling the royalties as a <a href="http://www.noperformancetax.org/">&#8220;tax&#8221;</a>.  This didn&#8217;t get much traction with Congress who saw through the disingenuous claim.  It might have been that the record labels had a better lobby than the NAB.</p>
<p>A number of big broadcasters finally came to the conclusion that stonewalling the royalty tsunami was not going to work, so they sat down to get the best deal they could.</p>
<p>The crux of the draft is that broadcasters will pay royalties a lower rate than webcasters and other distributors, and to sweeten the deal, they tossed in an additional wrinkle:  Require FM radios in every cellphone.</p>
<p>This kind of <a href="http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Protectionism.html">protectionist</a> ploy never works out in the end.  There are a raft of reasons why this is a BAD IDEA.</p>
<ul>
<li>First and Foremost &#8211; AM Radio gets no cellphone radio &#8211; AM music stations pay the royalties, but get no sweetener.</li>
<li>The deal is for FM Analog radios &#8211; Not Digital radios &#8211; effectively crippling deployment of  <a href="http://www.hdradio.com/">HD Radio</a></li>
<li>The cellphone buyer has to pay for an FM radio raising the cost of the cellphone</li>
<li>The cellphone has to have an FM radio even if the phone has only a tiny speaker or no headphone jack</li>
<li>Tiny FM radios without a headphone connected have terrible sensitivity, giving the listener a bad experience with FM Radio</li>
<li>Cellphones will have the cheapest FM radio possible giving the listener an even worse FM Radio experience.</li>
</ul>
<p>The first two factors are critically detrimental to broadcasting.  The balance of the problems set up radio for a bad user experience, driving listeners to more reliable and satisfying choices.</p>
<p>All AM broadcasters and broadcasters who have invested in HD Radio need to let the NAB know that they think that this is a BAD BARGAIN for radio, and let your Congressmen know that this kind of protectionist scheme is not in radio&#8217;s long term interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2010/09/am-gets-short-shrift-in-performance-royalty-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Mexican HD Stations on the Air</title>
		<link>http://amband.org/2008/06/first-mexican-am-hd-stations-on-the-air/</link>
		<comments>http://amband.org/2008/06/first-mexican-am-hd-stations-on-the-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Happenings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amband.org/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/onair.gif" alt=" alt="" align="right" /><a title="Radio Currents Magazine" href="http://radiomagonline.com/currents/currents-062208/#mexican">Radio Currents</a> reports that the first two Mexican stations have started broadcasting in HD Radio.</p>
<p>XEEZ 970 Radio Palacios is broadcasting an AM HD Radio signal from the U.S./Mexico border town of Caborca, Sonora, using a Broadcast Electronics transmission system.</p>
<p>XHTY-FM 94.5 in Tijuana on the FM Side has installed a Nautel V10 HD Radio transmitter. The station is operated by Uniradio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://amband.org/2008/06/first-mexican-am-hd-stations-on-the-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	<a href="http://nvgj.nl/golfmetnvgj.php?ad=6"><!-- Private Link --></a></channel>
</rss>

